Evaluation of Ayurvedic Compound Formulation 5- Sama
Śarkarć Cūrna
Ashok Kumar Tiwari*, Manoj Kumar Tripathi and Neelesh Dwivedi
Ayurveda Sadan, JRD TATA Foundation
for Research in Ayurveda & Yoga Science,
Arogyadham, Deendayal Research
Institute, Chitrakoot, Satna
485780(M.P)
*Corresponding Author E-mail: ashokckt77@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT:
Natural products
from plant, animal and minerals have been the basis of the treatment of human
disease. India is a vast repository of medicinal plants that are used in
traditional medical treatments Herbal medicines as the major remedy in
traditional system of medicine have been used in medical practices since antiquity.
Medicinal plants play an important role in the development of potent
therapeutic agents. To keep this view in mind, a polyherbal
Sama Śarkarć Cūrna is formulated in house, which is very effective in
stomach disorders, asthma, heart diseases and bronchitis. It formulated using
eight single drugs viz Zingiber officinale (rhizome), Piper longum
(fruits), Piper nigrum
(fruits), Mesua ferrea
(Stamen), Cinnamomum tamala
(leaf), Cinnamomum zeylanicum
(stem bark), Elettaria cardamomum (seeds)
and Sita. All the ingredients and curna
were analyzed in order to assess the authenticity of the drugs based on ayurvedic requirement following a series of
physical-chemical, phyto-chemical, chromatography,
microbiological parameters. Herbal medicines are inherently different from
conventional pharmacological treatments, but presently there is no way to
assess their efficacy other than by currently used conventional clinical trial
methodologies, in which efficacy is conventionally assessed by clinical,
laboratory, or diagnostic outcomes. Systematic study of herbal drug following
quality parameters can improve
morbidity, mortality, and of course quality of life. There is, however, scope
to utilize the flexibility inherent in the modern scientific method for
conducting studies on herbal medicines.
KEYWORDS: Ayurvedic formulation, Sama Śarkarć cūrna, quality control parameter.
INTRODUCTION:
Ayurveda, like traditional medical science, is the one of the
most ancient medical science of the world. Basic feature of Ayurveda
is its holistic approach to treat human beings as a whole and it restore
harmony among the human beings, plants and environment. Ayurveda
is based on Tridosha
principal (Vaya, Pitta, and Kaph) and Panchbhuta therapy (Rasa, Vipaka, Veerya,
Prabhava, and Guna). By knowing the standards
of a medicine following qualitative and quantitative parameters and method
followed in single and formulated drug can improve the efficacy and efficiency
of drug as well as confidence of doctor and patient.
Goal of standardization is to assess the authenticity
of the drug based on the above principal. Medicinal plants
play an important role in the development of potent therapeutic agents. To keep this view in mind, a polyherbal Sama Śarkarć Cūrna is
formulated in-house, which is very effective in stomach disorders, asthma,
heart diseases and bronchitis(Anonymous,
2000).
It was formulated
using eight single drugs viz Suṇṭhi
(Zingiber officinale - rhizome), Kana (Piper longum - fruit), Marica (Piper
nigrum - fruit), Nćga (Mesua
ferrea -
stamen), Dala (Cinnamomum
tamala -
leaf), Tvak (Cinnamomum zeylanicum - stem bark), Elć (Elettaria
cardamomum
- seed) and Sitć (sugar) in equal
quantity (Anonymous, 1996 and
Anonymous, 2000). Present study describes the scientific evaluation and standardization of compound drug Sama Śarkarć Cūrna and its single ingredients (Anonymous, 2008). Both are useful in Ayurveda, Siddha and Unani as single or in combination with other drugs. Hence
the purpose of standardization of raw drugs and formulation is obviously to
ensure the therapeutic efficacy of the drug.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Preparation of the Cūrna
All the ingredients were used of Pharmacopoeial
quality (Anonymous, 2000). These
were washed, dried and ground individually passed through 180 µm separately
then weighed separately, mixed in specified ratio and passed through 355
µm to obtain a homogenous blend. It was
stored in an airtight container to protect from light and moisture. Five
different samples of Sama Sarkarć
Cūrna three samples were prepared at research
laboratory Ayurveda Sadan, Chtrakoot Batch - A, B and C and two samples
were prepared at Chitrakoot Rsshala
Pharmacy, Chitrakoot Batch -D and E were studied.
Each sample of Sama Śarkarć Cūrna was formulated using eight ingredients (Anonymous, 2000) i.e. Z. officinale, P.
longum, P. nigrum, M.
ferrea, C.
tamala, C.
zeylanicum,
E. cardamomum and Sitć in equal proportion.
Physico-chemical parameters:
Organoleptic characters, particle size and physico-chemical
analysis of all the samples were carried out (Anonymous, 2008 and Patel et al.,
2006). Quantitative analysis for total ash, acid insoluble ash, water
soluble ash, extractive values in water soluble and alcohol soluble extractive,
loss on drying at 105°C and pH of filtrate of 10% w/v aqueous
solution were checked in triplicate according to the prescribed Quality control
methods for medicinal plant material (Anonymous, 1998 and Lohar, 2007).
Microscopic characteristics:
For microscopic analysis (Kokate,
1994) a small quantity represent of the Cūrnas,
along with the genuine samples, i.e. Suṇṭhi
(Z. officinale, rhizome), Kana (P. longum, fruits), Marica (P.
nigrum, fruits), Nćga (M. ferrea, stamen), Dala (C. tamala, leaf), Tvak
(C. zeylanicum, stem bark), Elć (E. cardamomum, seeds) and Sitć
(sugar) was mixed with water, stained with iodine and mounted in glycerin, were used to examine the
starch grains and its type. Another small quantity of samples cleared by
heating with chloral hydrate
and mounted in glycerin was
used to identify diagnostic microscopical characters
of the ingredients. Further, small quantity of the Cūrna
cleared with dilute KOH (5%) and was mounted in glycerin; was subjected to
microscopic examination.
Table 1. Quality test for the finished product, Sama Śarkara Cūrna
|
Parameter |
Sama Śarkara Cūrna |
Average value |
||||
|
Batch-A |
Batch-B |
Batch-C |
Batch- D |
Batch -E |
||
|
Loss on drying at 105°C (%) |
4.10 |
4.20 |
4.40 |
4.40 |
4.40 |
4.30 |
|
Total ash (%) |
5.50 |
5.20 |
5.20 |
5.60 |
5.60 |
5.52 |
|
Acid-insoluble ash (%) |
0.70 |
0.80 |
0.70 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.68 |
|
Alcohol-soluble extractive (%) |
6.70 |
6.70 |
6.60 |
6.50 |
6.70 |
6.64 |
|
Water-soluble extractive (%) |
62.40 |
62.70 |
62.10 |
62.20 |
62.50 |
62.38 |
|
pH (10%) aqueous solution |
5.60 |
5.70 |
5.60 |
5.80 |
5.70 |
5.68 |
|
Parameter |
Sama Śarkara Cūrna |
|||||||
|
unthī |
Kana (Fr.) |
Marica (Fr.) |
Naga (Stmn) |
Dala (Lf.) |
Tvak (st. bk.) |
Ela (Sd.) |
Sitć |
|
|
Loss on drying at 105°C (%) |
8.68 |
11.25 |
6.95 |
6.96 |
6.95 |
8.15 |
6.35 |
1.06 |
|
Total ash (%) |
5.84 |
6.61 |
4.28 |
5.33 |
6.00 |
2.90 |
4.10 |
- |
|
Acid-insoluble ash (%) |
1.50 |
0.36 |
0.43 |
2.56 |
0.97 |
1.80 |
3.61 |
0.48 |
|
Alcohol-soluble extractive (%) |
4.14 |
7.85 |
7.14 |
17.63 |
6.14 |
3.96 |
10.37 |
- |
|
Water-soluble extractive (%) |
15.45 |
19.5 |
11.45 |
15.19 |
15.45 |
4.73 |
15.11 |
- |
|
pH (10%) aqueous solution |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Note - Batch A, B and C - Research
laboratory Ayurveda Sadan, Chitrakoot and Batch
D and E - Chitrakoot
Rasshala Pharmacy, Chitrakoot
Table 2. Rf
value of test solution in Sama Śarkara Cūrna at 254 nm (before derivatization)
|
Rf values |
Sama Śarkara Cūrna |
Single
ingredients |
|||||||||||
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
|
Rf 1 (black) |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
NA |
NA |
0.60 |
0.22 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
Rf 2 (black) |
0.64 |
0.64 |
0.64 |
0.64 |
0.64 |
NA |
NA |
0.64 |
0.26 |
0.64 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
Rf 3 (black) |
0.68 |
0.68 |
0.68 |
0.68 |
0.68 |
0.68 |
NA |
NA |
0.64 |
NA |
NA |
0.68 |
NA |
|
Rf 4 (black) |
0.70 |
0.70 |
0.70 |
0.70 |
0.70 |
NA |
NA |
0.70 |
0.73 |
0.70 |
NA |
0.70 |
NA |
|
Rf 5 (black) |
0.80 |
0.80 |
0.80 |
0.80 |
0.80 |
0.80 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.80 |
NA |
|
Rf 6 (black) |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.90 |
0.93 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA- NA-Major
spot not appeared
Figure
1. Powder characteristics of Sama Śarkarć Cūrna
Table 3. Rf value
of test solution in Sama Śarkara Cūrna at 366 nm (before derivatization)
|
Rf values |
Sama Śarkara Cūrna |
Single
ingredients |
|||||||||||
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
|
Rf 1(pink) |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.10 |
NA |
0.10 |
NA |
|
Rf 2(fluorescent ) |
0.14 |
0.14 |
0.14 |
0.14 |
0.14 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.14 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
Rf 3 (brick red) |
0.43 |
0.43 |
0.43 |
0.43 |
0.43 |
0.43 |
0.43 |
NA |
NA |
0.43 |
NA |
0.43 |
NA |
|
Rf 4 (white) |
0.46 |
0.46 |
0.46 |
0.46 |
0.46 |
NA |
NA |
0.46 |
NA |
0.46 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
Rf 5(white) |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
NA |
NA |
0.55 |
NA |
NA |
0.55 |
NA |
NA |
|
Rf6(light
yellow) |
0.62 |
0.62 |
0.62 |
0.62 |
0.62 |
NA |
NA |
0.62 |
NA |
0.62 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
Rf 7(white) |
0.73 |
0.73 |
0.73 |
0.73 |
0.73 |
0.73 |
NA |
0.73 |
0.73 |
NA |
0.73 |
NA |
NA |
NA- NA-Major spot not
appeared
Table 4. Rf value
of test solution in Sama Śarkara Cūrna
at 254 nm (after derivatization)
|
Rf values |
Sama
Śarkarć
Cūrna |
Single Ingredients |
||||||||||||
|
003A |
003B |
003C |
003D |
003E |
Tvak |
Elć |
Marica, |
Nćga |
Kana |
Śunthī |
Dala |
Sitć |
||
|
Rf1 (yellow) |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.10 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
Rf2 (light yellow) |
0.23 |
0.23 |
0.23 |
0.23 |
0.23 |
0.23 |
NA |
NA |
0.23 |
0.23 |
NA |
0.23 |
NA |
|
|
Rf3 (reddish
brown) |
0.34 |
0.34 |
0.34 |
0.34 |
0.34 |
NA |
NA |
0.34 |
NA |
0.34 |
0.34 |
NA |
NA |
|
|
Rf4 (sky blue) |
0.38 |
0.38 |
0.38 |
0.38 |
0.38 |
NA |
NA |
0.38 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
Rf 5 (brown) |
0.42 |
0.42 |
0.42 |
0.42 |
0.42 |
NA |
NA |
0.42 |
NA |
0.42 |
NA |
0.42 |
NA |
|
|
Rf 6 (brown) |
0.56 |
0.56 |
0.56 |
0.56 |
0.56 |
NA |
NA |
0.56 |
NA |
0.56 |
0.56 |
NA |
NA |
|
|
Rf 7 (purple) |
0.73 |
0.73 |
0.73 |
0.73 |
0.73 |
NA |
NA |
0.73 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
Rf 8(black) |
0.77 |
0.77 |
0.77 |
0.77 |
0.77 |
0.77 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.77 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
|
Rf 9(black) |
0.93 |
0.93 |
0.93 |
0.93 |
0.93 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.93 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
|
NA- NA-Major spot not
appeared
Figure 2. Powder
characteristics of Sama Śarkarć Cūrna
Figure 3 . Powder
characteristics of Sama Śarkarć Cūrna
Figure 4 . TLC Finger prints
in test solution of Sama Śarkara Cūrna at 254 nm
(before derivatization)
Test Solutions of Sama Śarkara Cūrna for:
Batch - A, Batch - B,
Batch C, Batch - D, E : Batch - E 1: Tvak, 2: Ela, 3: Marica , 4: Naga, 5: Pippali, 6: Sunthi,
7: Dala(Tejpatra), 8: Sita (Iksu)
Figure 5 . TLC
Finger prints in test solution of Sama Śarkarć Cūrna at 366 nm (before derivatization)
Figure 6 . TLC Finger prints in test solution of Sama Śarkarć Cūrna at 254 nm
(after derivatization)
High Performance Thin Layer
Chromatography (HPTLC) profile:
For HPTLC, 2gm of each sample was extracted with 25 ml
of methanol on boiling water
bath for 25 min. consecutively of 3 times using fresh portion of 25 ml methanol, filtrate and concentrated.
Similarly, methanolic
extracts were prepared for all eight ingredients, i.e. Z. officinale rhizome (Anonymous, 2012 and Anonymous, 2010 ), P. longum
fruits (Anonymous, 2003), P. nigrum
fruits, M. ferrea stamen
(Anonymous, 2005), C. tamala leaf (Anonymous, 2005), C. zeylanicum stem
bark, E. cardamomum seeds (Anonymous, 2003) and Sitć ingredients for use as reference.
TLC of extracts of all the samples and the reference
ingredients was carried out on silica gel 60 F254 precoated plates (0.2 mm thickness; from Merck India
Limited Mumbai). An Applicator from Camag Linomat -5 (Camag Switzerland:
140443) was used for band application and photo documentation unit (Camag Reprostar-3:140604) was used for documentation of
chromatographic fingerprints. The mobile phase used was Toluene: Ethyl acetate: Formic acid (7: 2.5: 0.5). The plate was
developed over a distance of 9 cm in a saturated development chamber (Twin
trough chamber (10×10 cm with SS
lid, and visualized under visible light, 254
nm and 366nm. After spraying with 5% methanolic sulphuric
acid followed by heating at 1100C for 5-10 min (Anonymous, 1998 and Lohar, 2007).
RESULTS
AND DISCUSSION:
Sama Śarkarć Cūrna samples from 2 different manufactures,
Batch-A, Batch-B, Batch-C, Batch-D, Batch-E, were subjected to analysis as
above. All samples were dusty cream
colored powder with a characteristic odour, sweetish
bitter taste. The powder completely passes through 355 µm and not less than 50 percent through 180
µm. Results of loss on drying at 105 0C
4.30%, total ash content 5.32%, acid
insoluble ash 0.68%, alcohol soluble extractive 6.64%, water soluble extractive
62.68%, and pH 5.68 were calculated and are given in Table 1.
Microscopic examinations were also carried out to see
presence of the different ingredients in all 5 samples of Sama Śarkarć Cūrna
(Figures1-3). Groups of cork cells, fragment of fibres,
pitted, septate fibres with
reticulate and spiral thickening, oleo-resin canal, parenchymatous
cell filled with starch grains (Sunthi); fragments of
parenchyma, oval to elongated stone cells, oil globules, starch grains (Kana); perisperm cells filled with starch
grains, slightly elongated stone cells, beaker-shaped stone, aleurone grains (Marica); spongy parenchyma, palisade tissue, trichomes, fibres (Dala); perenchymatus cells, elongated cells, pollen grains (Naga); cork cells, acicular crystals
of calcium-oxalate, stone cells, parenchymatous cell,
sclereids (Tvak); perisperm cells filled
with starch grains, schlerenchymatous cells,
prismatic crystals of calcium oxalate, oil globules, parenchymatous
cells filled with oil globules and aleurone grains (Ela).
TLC of methanolic extracts of
all the samples and there reference ingredients were carried out on silica gel
plates (Figures 4-5). Several bands were
observed, some of which were specific to the individual ingredients. These bands were chosen to identify the
presence or absent of the individual ingredients in each of the five samples.
It was observed that all these identifying bands were present in all of Cūrna samples thereby indicating the presence of all
the eight ingredients in each of them. Tables 2-4 enlist identifying bands of
the individual ingredients along with their Rf
values.
CONCLUSION:
From the present studies, it can be calculated that the
characteristic microscopical characteristics and the
distinguishing band in the HPTLC profiles are very important for monitoring the
quality of the Cūrna formulation as well as for
establishing whether all the required ingredients are present in them. Also,
standardization and development for reliable quality protocols for Ayurvedic formulations are important for keeping a check on
batch to batch variations. Hence, the physiochemical parameters, quantitative
analysis, HPTLC fingerprinting profiles and the microscopic characteristics
together may be used for quality evaluation and the standardization of compound
formulations and maintaining their quality, purity and efficacy.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
Authors are thankful to Dr.
Bharat Pathak, General Secretary Deendayal
Research Institute, Chitrakoot for providing the
research facilities. Authors are also thankful to Department of AYUSH, Ministry
of Health and Family Welfare, and Government of India for providing the
financial support.
REFERENCES:
1. Anonymous. The Ayurvedic Formulary of India. Part II, Government of India,
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, The Controller of
Publications, Civil Lines Delhi. 7:18;(2000): 129.
2. Anonymous. Indian
Pharmacopoeia. Government of India, The Controller of Publications, Delhi. 2
(1996): A53-A54.
3. Anonymous. The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India. Government of India,
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Department of ISM andH,
New Delhi.Part I,Vol.I-VI;
(2000):101-104,113-116,118-119,115-117,91-92,218-219.
4.
Anonymous. Quality Control Manual for Ayurvedic, Siddha and Unani medicines. Government of India, Department of AYUSH,
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, PLIM, Ghaziabad. 2008:1-99.
5.
Patel PM, Patel NM and Goyal
RK. Quality Control of Herbal Products. The Indian Pharmacist. 5(45); (2006): 26-30.
6.
Anonymous. Quality control methods for medicial plant
materials. WHO, Geneva. 1998.
7. Lohar DR. Protocol For
Testing Ayurvedic , Siddha and
Unani medicines. Govt
of India, Department of AYUSH, Ministry of Health and
Family Welfare, PLIM, Ghaziabad. 2007: 40-108.
8.
Kokate CK. Practical Pharmacognosy.
Vallabh Prakashan, New
Delhi, India. 1994: 54.
9.
Anonymous. Phytochemical reference Standards of
selected Indian Medicinal Plants. Published by Medicinal Plants Unit, ICMR, New
Delhi. 2 (2012): 157-166.
10.
Anonymous. Quality Standards of Indian Medicinal
Plants, Published by Medicinal Plants Unit. ICMR, New Delhi. 8 (2010): 347-356.
11.
Anonymous. Quality Standards of Indian Medicinal
Plants, Published by Medicinal Plants Unit. ICMR, New Delhi. 1 (2003): 95-101,
168-173.
12.
Anonymous. Quality Standards of Indian Medicinal
Plants. Published by Medicinal Plants Unit, ICMR, New Delhi. 3 (2005): 149-157,
254-261.
Received on
16.11.2013 Modified on 10.12.2013
Accepted on 15.12.2013
©A&V Publications All right reserved
Res. J. Pharmacognosy & Phytochem.
6(1): Jan.-Mar. 2014; Page 09-15